Surveillance
Comments on the Clearview AI joint Report of Findings
On February 3, 2021, the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC), the Commission d’accès à l’information du Québec (CAI), the Information and Privacy Commissioner for British Columbia (OIPC BC), and the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Alberta (AB OIPC, and together with the BC OIPC, the CAI and the OPC, the Regulators), published…
Read More »Clearview AI’s unlawful practices represented mass surveillance of Canadians, commissioners say
February 3, 2021 – Technology company Clearview AI’s scraping of billions of images of people from across the Internet represented mass surveillance and was a clear violation of the privacy rights of Canadians, an investigation has found. The joint investigation by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, the Commission…
Read More »Cadillac Fairview collected 5 million shoppers’ images
October 29, 2020 – Cadillac Fairview – one of North America’s largest commercial real estate companies – embedded cameras inside their digital information kiosks at 12 shopping malls across Canada and used facial recognition technology without their customers’ knowledge or consent, an investigation by the federal, Alberta and BC Privacy Commissioners…
Read More »CJEU throws wrinkle into EU-UK adequacy talks
The Court of Justice of the European Union continues to make things interesting in the data protection world. First came the court’s “Schrems II” decision last July, and this week, the CJEU issued a ruling that could spring a leak and potentially sink adequacy negotiations between the U.K. and EU.…
Read More »For the IoT, User Anonymity Shouldn’t Be an Afterthought. It Should Be Baked In From the Start
The Internet of Things has the potential to usher in many possibilities—including a mass surveillance state. In the July issue, I wrote about how user consent is an important prerequisite for companies building connected devices. But there are other ways companies are trying to ensure that connected devices don’t invade people’s…
Read More »US surveillance: s702 FISA, EO 12333, PRISM and UPSTREAM
In “Schrems II” (Case C-311/18), the CJEU invalidated Privacy Shield based on the potential interference with data subject rights caused by US government surveillance carried out under Section 702 of FISA and EO 12333. The Court also referred to PRISM and UPSTREAM, two surveillance programs revealed by the Snowden leaks.…
Read More »Canadians can now opt out of Clearview AI facial recognition, with a catch
Canadians may now request they not appear in Clearview AI’s facial recognition search results, days after the controversial U.S.-based firm announced it was pulling out of this country. Sometime this week, Clearview quietly posted a link on its website allowing Canadian residents to “opt out.” The company doesn’t ask for…
Read More »Google’s Promise to Delete Your Data Has a Major Loophole
Google’s push to become a privacy-positive company over the past year has been, depending on how you look at it, an act of genuine benevolence, a brilliant marketing decision, or straight-up bullshit. So when Google CEO Sundar Pichai announced the company’s latest moves in the privacy-protecting space on Twitter yesterday,…
Read More »Trump’s data-hungry, invasive app is a voter surveillance tool of extraordinary power
• Trump 2020 app uses data to sidestep online platforms • Biden app accesses phone contacts to build ‘relational organizing’ • Trump inspiration appears to come from India’s Narendra Modi Ahead of President Trump’s rally in Tulsa, Oklahoma, his 2020 re-election campaign manager Brad Parscale tweeted about the event. “Just…
Read More »Oracle’s BlueKai tracks you across the web. That data spilled online.
Have you ever wondered why online ads appear for things that you were just thinking about? There’s no big conspiracy. Ad tech can be creepily accurate. Tech giant Oracle is one of a few companies in Silicon Valley that has near-perfected the art of tracking people across the internet. The…
Read More »












