Facebook Inc. suffered a setback in a key challenge to its business model as Germany’s highest civil court said that it has “no doubt” that the social network misuses its dominant market position.
Judges at a hearing on Tuesday ruled that Facebook must comply with a strict order curbing the network’s leeway in tracking users’ browsing and smartphone apps even as it fights the original ruling in a lower court.
“We have no doubt that Facebook has a dominant market position on the social network market and that it misuses its position,” said presiding judge Peter Meier-Beck of the Federal Court of Justice in Karlsruhe.
In February 2019, the Federal Cartel Office made a landmark attack on Facebook’s advertising model, telling the company to stop “unrestrictedly collecting and using” data and combining it with users’ Facebook accounts without getting their “qualified” consent. One click to agree to its voluminous terms wasn’t enough for that as user had no choice other than to agree to everything. The regulator was breaking new ground by using antitrust law to tackle data privacy.
Facebook on Tuesday said it will continue to fight the order in the Dusseldorf court where the main case is pending. There will be no immediate changes for people or businesses who use products and services in Germany, the network said.
“Today’s decision relates to the preliminary proceedings on the stay order,” Facebook said. “The main proceedings, before the court of appeals, are ongoing and we will continue to defend our position that there is no antitrust abuse.”
The company initially won a suspension of the antitrust decision in a lower tribunal in August and was asking the top judges to keep the order suspended while the sides continue to argue over it. The dispute will now return to the court in Dusseldorf.
Nevertheless, Facebook now must comply with the order despite the ongoing case. The company has four months to work out a plan how to adhere to the restrictions on data collection in Germany and then another 10 months to implement the changes.
The German judges on Tuesday said it doesn’t matter whether Facebook’s terms are in line with European Union data laws. Rather, the terms are illicit because they don’t grant users the right to choose between allowing Facebook to track them or to limit data collection to what users post on their accounts.
“As a dominant network, Facebook has a special responsibility to keep competition alive on the social-network market,” the court said. “The high economic value of data must also be taken into account.”
Most users would want…
Privacy 2024 Recap – some significant decisions, slow progress for reform
The past year saw a few court decisions of note as well as halting progress toward privacy…
Schrems II Judgment Day
The Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU“) issued its judgment today in …
